
Are You a Person of Your Word?
Mar 23, 2010 by Craig Blomberg | 3 Comments
“Above all, my brothers and sisters, do not swear—not by heaven or by earth or by anything else. All you need to say is a simple ‘Yes’ or ‘No.’ Otherwise you will be condemned.” (James 5:12 TNIV)
When people want to lament the decline in morals in this country, they typically point out upswings in violence (especially to the unborn), promiscuous sex (of both hetero- and homo- varieties), and perhaps our enslavement to greed and consumerism. Without denying any of those trends, I wonder if more attention needs to be paid to being people of integrity—whose word and promises can be trusted. After all, the Ten Commandments include not only prohibitions against murder, adultery and coveting but also against bearing false witness.
The passage in James 5 is a quotation from the Sermon on the Mount (Matt. 5:37). The context in both cases is about taking oaths (not about cussing). The point is not so much a prohibition, as our Quaker and Mennonite friends have often thought, against solemnly swearing in a lawcourt that something is true, but rather against the notion that certain kinds of oaths are less binding than others (see Matt. 5:33-36). If that was the problem afflicting some of the Pharisees, Jesus explains, then don’t use oaths at all. Just be so trustworthy that if you say you will do something, then you will do it.
My grandfather was a very successful businessman in a small-to-medium-sized town in Iowa. He died in 1984 at the age of 84, when I was 29. I remember him more than once talking about how back before World War II, in his community, there were few of the elaborate contracts of today, just friends’ words to each other. You promise to buy this land by such-and-such a date and you have the money to the seller on time. You promise to deliver certain goods to a retailer and you never shortchange them. The vast majority of the time the system worked, whether the person was a Christian or not.
After the war, my grandpa would continue, some people started to renege often enough on such deals that now they needed to be sealed with a handshake. Then, somewhere in the mid-60s, as he was getting ready to retire, more and more formal contracts were coming to be written for people to sign, because handshakes weren’t always a reliable guide to people’s follow-through on their commitments. Today, even signatures mean little in some circles, so we have endless litigation by people suing those who have reneged on formal contracts.
I had a disturbing conversation with a group of Christians recently that I led in a case study about a situation in which a Christian job applicant reneged on a promise to accept a job if offered it, in favor of a more attractive offer that had subsequently emerged. About half of the group saw nothing wrong with that, since no contract had yet been signed. Even more disturbing was the fact that some saw nothing wrong with leaving a brand-new job after just having signed a contract and after having made a verbal multi-year commitment (not in the contract), again in favor of a more attractive position.
Is it any wonder so many marriages these days end in divorce, not as they used to after years of struggle and hurt, but at the slightest sign of personal inconvenience? I met a divorcee in her mid-thirties recently who initiated proceedings after only a two-year marriage because her husband failed to keep a tidy home and this showed his “profound disrespect for her,” because she had repeatedly asked him to keep things cleaner. I probed to see if there wasn’t anything more serious than that but there wasn’t. I asked if they had tried counseling and she replied, “Oh yes, as soon as he heard I was talking about divorce, he insisted we go for counseling. We went a few times. But my heart had already checked out, so I didn’t see any point in continuing.”
What I wanted to ask but didn’t was “So why should anyone ever believe you again when you promise to do something for them, especially if it is something much less solemn than a promise to stay in a marriage for life?”
James and Jesus teach is that if we promise to do something and have it within our power to carry it out, then we are to do it, period. End of discussion. Become known as somebody so trustworthy that you don’t even need to shake hands, much less sign a contract. People know you’re a person of your word. And it’s striking how strongly they phrase the alternative: In James: “otherwise you will be condemned.” In Matthew: “anything beyond this comes from the evil one.” Ouch!


Comments
3 Comments | Login to Post Comments
Chris Tenny Mar 23, 2010 10:34am
Good word and encouraging to me personally.
I have had many "temptations" recently that many of the Christians you mention would disagree with my decision. Upon arrival to San Jose, our plan was to get local jobs in an effort to get plugged into the community to help our church planting efforts. Jobs were not forthcoming then. Yet, a little church asked me to fulfill there pastoral needs (part-time so as to allow our church planting to continue) while they conducted a pastoral search. Their payment as been sufficient for our needs here. In the meantime, the engineering market improved. I have now had multiple engineering opportunities come up that would pay substantially, enough to erase all my student debt in less than a year, give us a more comfortable lifestyle, and fund our church plant. At one point I interviewed for a position and even the Elders of this little church said formally, our contract had been fulfilled (3-6 months). They would very much like me to stick around but technically I didn't have to. I am thankful that job didn't come through and even though it made sense, I was not at peace about it. Since then I have had over a dozen other opportunities which I have declined.
I am choosing to stick around and see it through despite "better" opportunities elsewhere. Our initial formal document has expired and there have only been very informal verbal commitments extending it. It doesn't seem right for me to view my responsibilities as an exchange of goods and services for money. I think I agreed to pastor this church for this season and I cannot leave in the middle of it for "greener pastures" which sounds eerily like Lot's decision (Gen 13:10).
William Farris Mar 23, 2010 12:39pm
I agree wholeheartedly with this interpretation of the swearing of various types of oaths. And I strongly yearn for that simpler day when a person's word was binding. We are better off not swearing oaths but simply to answer with yes or no in order to avoid condemnation. But are handshake agreements the same thing as an oath? It is perhaps a bit more of a middle ground between a simple yes or no and a true oath. We all know how circumstances can change and that it depends on the situation as to whether it is honorable to follow through in light of the severity of those changes, especially when other people are affected such as your family. Otherwise, there is a certain tyranny to time and place if all that matters is the "handshake." Along with those more genteel times was perhaps an accompanying understanding on the part of both parties that extenuating circumstances may emerge that can in a sense nullify prior agreements - English Common Law acknowledges this.
Employment contracts are, like loans or government deals, contracts of adhesion, meaning that one party has most of the power in the deal. The bank, or the employer, being the party with all the money has most of the power. It is highly asymmetrical both from an economic point of view and, usually, from a functional point of view, as a potential employee does not know what all will specifically be entailed in the job prior to taking it and actually performing it. So, while following through on the "contract" to renders services is one thing, whether to take an engineering job to provide for family and church planting is a highly personal decision, and one that will be made from the gut feeling ultimately irrespective of all these other considerations. Disclaimer: I am an older legally trained engineer by trade and frustrated want-to-be scholar who knows enough theology to be dangerous. Since money enables me to buy books, pay tuition, and have more time to study, and pay for travels to the Holy Land, I therefore crave it for just such purposes :-)
Stephen Redden Mar 23, 2010 3:21pm
Great thoughts Dr. Blomberg. I think this is an area where we as Christians have an opportunity to shine in the midst of a culture of dwindling integrity. I had a conversation in my small group recently about how small acts of integrity stand out to people. As a pastor, I'm regularly wondering if that kind of integrity is being formed in our community and what we can do to participate with God in forming people in that way.