
Is Health Care and the New Testament Uninteresting?
Sep 14, 2009 by Craig Blomberg | 4 Comments
“When the perishable has been clothed with the imperishable, and the mortal with immortality, then the saying that is written will come true: ‘Death has been swallowed up in victory.’ ‘Where, O death, is your victory? Where, O death, is your sting?’” (1 Cor. 15:54-55)
Many thanks to those who wrote in response to DJ Turner’s invitation on Facebook for suggestions for topics for this blog. There was only one topic that two people mentioned, so I will begin with it. But, intriguingly, one person requested it and the other one called it “not interesting.” And that I find interesting!
I could envision someone saying health care and the New Testament was too complex a topic for a short blog. I could imagine someone saying it wasn’t as high a priority as some other issue. I could anticipate someone recognizing it really is more of a topic for systematic theology, since there are no Scriptural texts that explicitly address what kind of health care a nation should or shouldn’t have. But not interesting? Surely you jest. :) Such a person must be quite healthy. If they were seriously ill, or chronically disabled, I suspect the reaction would be very different.
Since it was decided that health care should be this year’s topic for the Vernon Grounds Institute of Public Ethics, centered on our campus, I really ought to say something about it. But from what text?
Recently, I was asked to fill in at a local church for one of our graduates who was out of town. He had been preaching through 1 Corinthians and had asked me to plug into the series by speaking on 15:35-58. It, like all of 1 Corinthians 15, is an exhilarating chapter, presenting the truth and glory of the bodily resurrection, first of Jesus and then of all believers. But what do you say by way of application from a text on resurrection for Christian living in the here and now?
Certainly, one common topic among commentators and theologians has yet to be overused in local pulpits: We are to model, individually and as churches, however imperfectly in this age, the kind of resurrection life that will one day be ours perfectly, for the sake of a watching world. If unbelievers can see believers living in a transformed way in this world, at least some will want what we have and come to the Lord. That was one of the big impetuses for my salvation, in high school, when I saw my peers through a Campus Life club talking about Jesus as making a difference in their daily lives and living in ways that made it visible
So what in the world does that have to do with health care? If we are created as embodied beings and if our eternal destiny is to be embodied, then our bodies matter. Of course, we remain lost forever if we live record long and physically healthy lives and die without Christ. But if we take Christ’s ministry of physical healing seriously, we will be concerned about the physical health of all in our world.
Occasionally, God heals miraculously. But those are the exceptional instances. We wouldn’t call them miracles if they happened often! There’s absolutely nothing wrong with praying for a miracle; there’s everything wrong with counting on one, promising one, or trying to manipulate God to grant us, or someone else, one. In the ancient world as well as the modern one, God has worked the vast majority of times through doctors, medicine, and natural healing processes.
None of this determines what is the best mechanism by which to give the greatest amount of affordable health care to the greatest number of people in any society. As with all political questions, people including Christian people, will probably always proposal multiple models and debate their relative merits. But caring for the physically sick should always be a priority for God’s people, even if not necessarily the highest priority. If our current system is increasingly unaffordable for increasing numbers of people (and it is)and if the gap is growing between the haves and the have-nots, even among the insured, as to who can have what quality of health care (and it is), then every Christian should want to reform the system in a way likely to create more help for more people.
If that’s not at the very least interesting to say nothing of downright urgent, it’s time for a heart check.


Comments
4 Comments | Login to Post Comments
gary vanderark Sep 14, 2009 10:57am
Craig- I love your blogs! You really understand health care.
Gary VanderArk
Keith Brofsky Sep 14, 2009 7:38pm
I don't know that Christians have a problem with reforming healthcare.
I think most people who are against the current reform, are more against government involvement, especially when the government
a) for all intent purposes is bankrupt and doesn't have funds to takeover part of the health system
b) has never proven itself to be efficient in running many departments
c) tends to have a large amount of waste, corruption and fraud that will only be compounded by getting involved in an industry that is about 12-16% of our GDP
That said, yes there are problems with our current system that need to be addressed. My hope is that we have 300 million people in this country there have to be a portion of them that are smart enough to assist the 535 sitting on Capitol Hill that are probably more concerned about their power, jobs and special interests groups that they are linked to. Sorry for being a cynic.....
Randy Widrick Sep 16, 2009 8:11am
The 2nd greatest commandment, "Love your neighbor as yourself", brings us face to face with a huge moral obligation to society.
A society should be lovingly and truthfully encouraged to align itself with Christian principles, working toward solutions that, as you say, "give the greatest amount of affordable health care to the greatest number of people." No, this is not easy and the forces of "the love of money and power" are arrayed against us, but loving, truthful discussion and negotiation can win the day.
We have a moral obligation as true followers of Christ to display an observable love to those around us. What does that mean? The answer is hard, the solution is multi-faceted and the opposition is great, but "with an abundance of counselors victory is assured." Too often, sadly, the Christian has left this to the hands of the government and taken the worldly philosophy that my mother jokingly says..."Get all you can! Can all you get! Sit on the lid!"
As true followers of Christ, we are commanded to love. The goal of the instruction of Paul was "love from a pure heart".
Personally, the mirror of His Holy Spirit looks at me and asks what I will do with my time, talent and resources. Who around me is in need for me to step in and alleviate their suffering? What is the role of my church? My time? What is my involvement to be in the political process?
The Word of God MUST be more than a nice book we read and quote. It must change our lives, renew our minds and motivate us to act. How can anyone say that any issue that touches humanity is "uninteresting", especially one as personal as individual health and well being?
The follower of Christ should be the beacons of light in this argument.
Please tell me where I am mistaken.
Randy
Binghamton
Dennis Hesselbarth Sep 20, 2009 3:42pm
Dr. Blomberg, at the time, I didn't have a NT topic to suggest for your blog, but Keith's comment suggests something that I believe needs some careful thought: the role of government & the role of the church in society. Often I hear people say "government is the problem," but it appears the NT is much more nuanced in describing the role of governments. Oz Guiness argues that American Christians, both right and left, now believe, despite their rhetoric, that government is central to human progress, hence the extreme passion to elect "their" people. Some NT perspectives would be helpful.