header-craig blomberg blog

Oh Yes, He’s the Right Reverend Professor Doctor So-and-So!

← back to blog home

Dec 19, 2011 by Craig Blomberg | 7 Comments

“They love the place of honor at banquets and the most important seats in the synagogues; they love to be greeted with respect in the marketplaces and to be called 'Rabbi' by others. But you are not to be called 'Rabbi,' for you have one Teacher, and you are all brothers. And do not call anyone on earth 'father,' for you have one Father, and he is in heaven.  Nor are you to be called instructors, for you have one Instructor, the Messiah. The greatest among you will be your servant” (Matthew 23:6-11).

     The Catholic priest is to be called “Father.” Historically, Protestant pastors have most commonly been called, “the Reverend.”  Churches that find it too presumptuous to think of “revering” their ministers—an action that borders on worship—often prefer “Pastor.”  If you get a Ph.D. you become a “Doctor.”  But the same is true if you get a D.Min. (or a D.Miss.), a degree requiring far less advanced expertise and technical scholarship.  But few laypeople fully grasp this, so the honor of being called the same title as someone with their Ph.D. (or Th.D. or Ed.D, etc.) remains.

     Different cultures use honorific titles differently.  In the U.S. if you teach at the tertiary level but don’t have a doctorate you are called “Professor.”  In the U.K. and other countries of the former British Commonwealth only those lecturers who attain chairs are considered professors, thus limiting the designation to people one notch above “Doctor.”  On the other hand medical doctors who become particularly renowned revert to being called “Mister”!  And you’d better learn these cultural distinctives or you’ll quickly offend someone “important”.

     Paradoxically, the same British culture that was so much more hierarchical than the upstart American revolutionaries and that still uses so many honorific titles (can you keep all the Church of England ones straight—vicar, rector, oblate, archdeacon, bishop, archbishop, deacon, vestry member, etc.?) also tends to use just first names between grad students and their academic supervisors.  I very much like being just Craig when I teach in England, Scotland, Ireland, Australia or New Zealand.

     Thanks to the personality (i.e., the personableness) of the patriarch of Denver Seminary for so many years, Dr. Vernon Grounds, many people came to know him simply as “Vernon.”  This has spawned a culture in which all successive presidents have been known to their fellow administrators and faculty simply by their first names—Haddon, Ed, Clyde, Craig and now Mark.  As I travel, I’m reminded of how rare this is at other American institutions.  But it’s so refreshingly healthy and biblical.

     The ancient Mediterranean world was very hierarchical and socially stratified.  Jesus challenges many of its practices—don’t take the seats of honor, don’t lord it over those who work for you, but take the back seat and exercise servant leadership.  Humble yourselves rather than exalting yourselves.  Matthew 23:6-11 finds Jesus rebuking the Pharisaic practice of calling teachers “Rabbi,” meaning “my master” or “Father” or “instructor” (a word that could also mean “guide”).  Of course, in the context of verse 6, it’s clearly the status and honor that accrue to the titles that Jesus is concerned his followers not strive for.

     Even if your church or Christian organization doesn’t overdo the use of titles, does it have an overly inflated view of it senior leader?  Does that leader actually try to foster such a view?  In a class recently on the Gospel of Matthew, I asked our six international students (out of twenty-two) about the church in their countries.  The students represented China (twice), Korea (twice), Ethiopia and Colombia.  All agreed that their pastors demanded and received a level of authority and obedience well beyond what Americans do and beyond what they found healthy or biblical.

     Some American churches have invested elder or deacon boards with too much authority, as those bodies hire and fire pastors with depressing regularity.  Some pastors who have stayed in one position for years have gathered a group of “yes-men” around them to create the kind of a board that will never threaten them, but it will never hold them accountable either. 

    Can you call your pastor by his or her first name only and feel comfortable doing so?  Will the pastor feel equally comfortable with you?  If not, why not?  Are the answers to that question biblical or just traditional?  More importantly, can you politely question their decisions and agree to disagree and still value each other or does somebody have to “win”?

Comments

7 Comments | Login to Post Comments

Brad Nickel Dec 19, 2011 2:45pm

Thanks for raising this topic. So important to have a right view of ourselves as leaders before God Almighty.

Brian Ernsberger Dec 19, 2011 7:12pm

Craig, heartily agree with the tenor of your article, but you leave off the idea of respect and rightily placed honor. We have several passages that speak to us to give honor. Call it some of my upbringing, but I always did and still do call those who are older than me, "Mr." or "Mrs." so-and-so. I've had some to tell me (their pastor) to call them by their first name. I have tried to abide by their wishes and have found it hard at times. I am a pastor and the people call me "Pastor Ernsberger." They do it out of respect and honor for the position I hold as their undershepherd; not for any of the disasterous reasons you cite. I agree that there have been many who have been called "Pastor" and have abused that position. That doesn't mean that we should abandon the use of the title "pastor." Getting rid of the title will not change the bad behavior of men.

Craig Blomberg Dec 20, 2011 10:28am

You raise good points. Everybody's culture, subculture, and subsubculture is a little different and we need to recognize all those differences. I'm reminded of when my grandmother was in her late seventies and still quite healthy but regularly visited the nursing home in her community to see some of the older people there (in their 80s and 90s). Used to all the employees always calling them by their first names, they were surprised when she used Mr. and Mrs. in addressing them. She replied that when she was young she was always taught to address "older people" that way! To her dying day (last spring at 104 in the same nursing home!) she could never bring herself to address an older person she didn't know well by his or her first name.

My reply to our graduates who find it difficult to call me Craig when they say they want to respect me is that if they want to respect me they will honor my wishes and call me Craig! Usually it works but not always.

I have no objection whatsoever to your policy, Brian, er, uh, Pastor Ernsberger :) but for myself I always want any respect I receive to be earned and not based on a position or office I hold.

Brian Ernsberger Dec 21, 2011 10:11am

Again, I agree with you Craig. Respect is earned, never demanded. It is not my "policy" to be called "pastor." People will typically ask me how to address me (where I live religion, of any stripe is rather nonexistent in the lives of many) I say our people usually call me "pastor" Ernsberger or the children will call me "pastor" E, since the last name is a mouth full. The position one holds does bring a level of respect whether wanted, desired or not. A judge is "your honor," the president is "Mr. President" or President _________." Those offices hold a certain level of respect whether or not the person holding that office is even worthy of that level.

Lanny Strohman Dec 21, 2011 12:53pm

Timely blog as Christmas is all about humility: lowly Joseph and Mary, Maji (who could have have been disappointed by what they found; yet ignoring what they may have thought of their honorific title bowed and worshiped), shepherds (really!) who ignored their already deplorable social position to propagate a most laughable story of a virgin giving birth to the Messiah.

A few scriptures come to mind. Phil. 2:3-4 "Do nothing out of selfish ambition or vain conceit (the acquisition of position or title), but in humility consider others better than yourselves. Each of you should look not only to your own interests, but also to the interests of others." Titles often blur the fact that we share equal status in the family of God. I way to often speak and behave in ways that demonstrate I do not believe their are other children in the family. 1 Thess. 5:12-13 "Now we ask you, brothers, to respect those who work hard among you, who are over you in the Lord and who admonish you. Hold them in the highest regard in love because of their work. Live in peace with each other." It appears that it is one's work, not title or position, that prompts esteem and honor. Hebrews 13:7 "Remember your leaders, who spoke the word of God to you. Consider the outcome of their way of life and imitate their faith." A title of honor seems to pale in signifcance when one considers the honor that accrues to one's life by living so exemplary that such living is imitated by others.

I like the moniker Craig, and thanks for your permission to use it without presumption. Merry Christmas, Craig.

Craig Blomberg Dec 21, 2011 6:45pm

Great to hear from you Lanny and thanks for the follow-up Pastor E! Yes, I always find it interesting when students or graduates who can't bring themselves to use my first name will call me Dr. B., presumably not because they can't manage my name but because it's sort of halfway to greater familiarity. Or one or two will just use Doc. I usually don't disclose that I always think of Snow White's dwarf! :)

Boyce Tesenair Dec 29, 2011 12:12pm

Yes, I feel fine calling our pastor by his first name. Yes I have disagreed with him, and we are still friends. It would not sever either one of us if we couldn't have different views on the Bible. The Bible teaches us that we should not call a pastor reverend.. Psalm 111:9 and Matthews 23: 6-10.