
Stop ALL End-Of-World Predictions, Period!
May 23, 2011 by Craig Blomberg | 15 Comments
“[Jesus] said to them, ‘It is not for you to know the times or dates the Father has set by his own authority” (Acts 1:7)
Harold Camping was wrong for the third time. Surprise, surprise, surprise! What actually is surprising is that anybody claiming to be a Christian followed him. Did they not know or care about his two failed prophecies in 1994 and 1995? Does it strike no one as blasphemous when he and his supporters read Mark 13:32 directly—“But about that day or hour no one knows, and even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father”—and then say,” even though almost all churches will tell you this means we can’t calculate a date, actually we can and here it is”? And he alone claims to be following the Bible? This is the height of arrogance and presumption.
Churches and Christians can get upset and blackball other churches and Christians because of the Bible translations they follow—ridiculous! They can insist publicly that the forms of baptism others practice are absolutely wrong--tactless. They can get downright nasty about issues like gay rights. But when something comes along about which they really should be righteously indignant, they sit back and do nothing.
There are legitimate issues at stake in Bible translation debates, though few people among those who get the most exercised really understand them. There are genuine exegetical issues at stake in debates about baptism, though many of them are little known. And the Bible does uniformly proscribe homosexual practice, though that is a separate issue from how we vote on various political debates related to civil rights.
BUT THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO WAY A PERSON CAN CLAIM TO CALCULATE THE DATE OF THE END WITHOUT FLAGRANTLY VIOLATING JESUS’ TEACHING. In 1992, every car in the old seminary campus parking lot had a bright red booklet put between their windshield and wipers, produced by a Korean sect predicting the rapture between Sep. 21-23, 1992. As misguided as that was, at least the group knew enough not to pick a “day or hour”—so they narrowed things down to a three-day period! Camping hasn’t even ever had the decency to make that kind of precaution.
What kind of emotions should Christians have after this latest failed prophecy? Many poke fun at its followers. A few are understandably saddened. Many probably just ignore it and move on. I suggest a better reaction—it’s time for Christians to get mad, really angry, and en masse hold people like Camping and whoever emerges next trying to do the same thing accountable. Call them on the carpet big time for doing such things. The Bible labels it false prophecy and while, in the New Testament age, we aren’t called to stone false prophets as in the Old Testament, we are certainly not called to tolerate them!
Why make such a big deal out of this? Because false prophets like Camping regularly lead people astray, some of whom then reject any form of Christianity when it turns out the prophecy fails. Just as bad, those looking for one more reason to ridicule Christianity find another good one and all of us get tarred with the same brush, looking foolish in the process.
But while I’m upset let me push things a step further. The Acts passage reproduced above uses the two most general terms in the Greek language for periods of times—chronos and kairos—HCSB and NET translate “times or periods.” So any Christian who ever claims to know that we are living in the year, or decade, or century or millennium in which Christ is returning is contradicting the explicit teaching of Jesus and needs to be rebuked!
Many Christians cognitively know this, but still so wish that it were near the end that they say things like, “Well, I know we can’t know for sure, but it sure seems like we must be very close to Judgment Day,” and when you ask them what they mean by “close” they say things like “well probably in this generation or the next” or words to that effect. Technically they haven’t blasphemed, but they still fuel the fires of the sinking-ship mentality.
How about we just assume that we might have several millennia of world history left and get on about all the things Christ has called us to do to make the world a better place, from evangelism to social action to everything in between, and once and for all end this escapist mentality that obsesses over a pretribulational rapture and doomsday watches of all different kinds on top of that! To quote a line from that fun movie of a couple of decades ago, “Network,” “I’m mad as h--- and I’m not going to take this any more!”


Comments
15 Comments | Login to Post Comments
Eric Ruggiero May 23, 2011 11:06am
Amen!
Walter Rachinski May 23, 2011 11:55am
Your sentiment is most certainly to be understood. What should be of equal concern is that in answering these provocative prognostications, we observe Paul's instruction to Timothy (2.2.24) The Lord's servant must not quarrel; instead, he must be kind to everyone, able to teach, not resentful. What we should feel compelled to do, is to draw attention to matters of Biblical interpretation, and matters of faulty scholarship, which in the CAMPING colossal failure via "making the Bible say something the Bible does not say" is the caveat. But there is a POSITIVE SIDE to this entire fiasco. In the end, Camping proved the INFALLIBILITY OF THE INSPIRED WORD, as Jesus gave it in Mark 13:32 i.e. "No one knows about that day or hour..." But there is one EVENTUALITY notice should have been given to: "And this gospel of the kingdom WILL be preached in the whole world as a testimolny to all nations, AND THEN THE END WILL COME (Matthew 24:14) which leads us to the impacting Second Advent on the populations of the world (Matthew 24:30-31; Revelation 1:7) i.e. the meaning of the word "mourn"--specifically, the impact that Jesus said who He said he was--and that the full realization of it will be what Jesus unfolded to Nicodemus in John 3:18 "Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because he has not believed in the name of God's one and only Son." HENCE the full impact of the Gk. "mourn" is the anticipation of God's wrath via the wailing and gnashing of teeth. WRBM
Clint Kirby May 23, 2011 12:41pm
Great word here Dr. Blomberg. People here in Poland have been asking me about this all weekend. I didn't give them the "Network" line though (maybe it wouldn't translate).
By the way, I started reading through "The Historical Reliability of the Gospels," a couple of days ago and am really enjoying it. Take care, I enjoy reading your blog from afar.
Barry Applewhite May 23, 2011 3:17pm
As a graduate of Dallas Seminary, I regularly get inquiries about details of prophecy. However, I cannot remember the last time anyone inquired about our responsibility to show mercy to the poor. I appreciate your strong emphasis on getting back to ministry for the cause of Christ rather than obsessing over prophetic details. Thanks for your thoughtful post. My blog references yours because you consistently hit the right biblical targets!
-Barry
Walter Rachinski May 23, 2011 3:23pm
An additional commentary I would offer is the need to connect the right texts of Scripture to the subjDOEect matter being discuseed. May I respectfully suggest to Craig, that the text he makes immediate reference to at the beginning of his commentary re CAMPING, does not have anything to do with either the SECOND COMING--THE DAY OF JUDGMENT--OR--THE END OF THE WORLD. Acts 1:7 has to do with the previous question in v. 6 "Lord, are you at this time going to restore the kingdom to Israel". WRBM
Ben Dunning May 23, 2011 3:34pm
good stuff just. we should be outraged. i do have a comment that takes a different tact.. we dont know the end. we cant stop it when it comes. all we can do is be ready. what does being ready look like? love God, love your neighbor, be light in this world... the only control we have over the mater is the way in which we honor and serve God. thats what prepares us for the ends coming in the first place. the kingdom of heaven is at hand. as Christians our job is to live it out.
Craig Blomberg May 23, 2011 7:00pm
Thanks, Eric and Clint! It's always interesting to look in the New Testament, Walter, at when Jesus and Paul get really mad and when they model or instruct greater mildness. The former response always comes with right-wing religious teachers, well trained in orthodoxy, who turn into false teachers. Consider the Pharisees in the Gospels and the Judaizers in Galatians. Camping qualifies at every turn!
Paul Adams May 23, 2011 7:39pm
Good words, Dr. B. Indeed believers need to call out this nonsense and call on God's Word as the definitive source for what the future brings. Of course, this is a grand opportunity to warn folks as well that the world as we know it will not continue on indefinitely as it is (2 Peter 3:9-14). Though we do not know when, we do know that God will someday make all things new.
Walter Rachinski May 23, 2011 7:45pm
Craig, I like you, am short on patience with "right-wing religious teachers". And yes, I am very familiar with FAMILY RADIO's Harold Camping (in which I can assure you the FAMILY RADIO staff I personally know are not of that ilk. What concerns me is when we rise to the occasion in RIGHTFUL OPPOSITION to those who WRONGLY DIVIDE THE WORD OF TRUTH. Harold Camping is not a "theologian's theologian"and those like you (and me no less) have little or no tolerance who misrepresent biblical eschatology in a manner that brings reproach to the GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM we have been called to proclaim. HENCE WE ALSO MUST GIVE HEED in our "rightly" referencing Scripture which speak to the issues which bring reproach to the Gospel we are called to proclaim. In this, I am sure you did not mean to reference Acts 1:7--which text does not speak to Camping's distorted eschatological issue as it speaks to the pervasive seeking of a restored kingdom to Israel (which perhaps more evangelicals seek than members of the Israeli nation. In this, I have written exegetical detail in my March 28 released (fourth) book "A Kingdom Not of This World." You will find this book a most interesting read. Bill Klein wrote the back cover endorsement.
Blessings, WRBM
Craig Blomberg May 24, 2011 8:35am
Acts 1:7 is most certainly relevant unless one holds a faulty eschatology predicting that the kingdom will be restored to Israel at some time other than Christ's second coming!
Charles D. Good May 28, 2011 1:03pm
This couldn't be a more relevant note for today. Thank you. Hope you and yours are well.
Tyler Dunstan May 31, 2011 12:50pm
Dr. Blomblerg,
While I share the sorrow and frustration that most Christian's feel about Camping's dangerous and sub-Christian eschatology (and their ecclesiology for that matter), I do think this whole issue raises good questions about NT eschatology. A few passages in the NT make it seem like Christians are supposed to be aware of the timing of the Lord's return. I would appreciate hearing your take on these passages.
1) 1 Thess 5:1-4, the oft quoted passage that describes the day of the Lord as a thief in the night that ends with Paul exhorting the Thessalonians to not let that day surprise them and come upon them as a thief (NRSV)
2) 2 Thess 2:1-4, faced with Christians who are distressed about eschatological timing, and anxious that they might have missed the Lords coming Paul gives them two clear signs by which they can know that the Lord's return is near (1) the rebellion (falling away?) and (2) the man of sin (antichrist?)
3) Mt 16:1-4; Lk 19:41-44, two passages where Jesus is chiding his generation for not knowing the times and seasons and thus missing the day of visitation. If Israel was condemned for not knowing the timing of God's coming in Christ, should the Church know when the Lord's 2nd Coming is near?
4) Finally, it is common to hear scholars say that Paul and the early Christians believed that Jesus would return in their lifetime and were wrong. How do you respond to this?
Craig Blomberg May 31, 2011 8:45pm
Important questions, Tyler. Briefly, my responses would be: 1) We are not surprised because we are always alert, not because we have special knowledge of the timing. 2) There are things that will happen to let us know he is near but given biblical definitions of nearness (Psa. 90:4, 2 Pet. 3:8-9) even these aren't as helpful as many would like. 3) What the Jews didn't recognize, according to these texts, was that the Messiah was there among them, which is different from knowing ahead of time when he was to come. 4) This rests on three key texts, none of which is best taken as meaning this (Mt. 10:23, Mark 9:1 and Mark 13:30). In context Mt. 10:23 refers to the disciples no having completed the evangelism of all of Israel before Christ's return, which remains true today. Mark 9:1 probably refers to the transfiguration, the next narrated event, not Christ's second coming. And Mark 13:30 is best understood as referring to all of the preceding signs occurring in Jesus' generation, but not including his return itself, since in the preceding verse he says when you see these things taking place know that he is near. It wouldn't make any sense to include his return among "these things" because when he return he won't just be near, he'll be here!
Tyler Dunstan Jun 1, 2011 2:03pm
Dr. Blomberg,
Thank you for your reply. Concerning #4, I actually wasn't thinking of the Gospel texts you mentioned. At the present time I am more inclined to follow N.T. Wright's reading of the "coming of the son of man" texts in the Gospels. However, I imagine that is another subject for another day. I was mostly thinking of four passages in Paul and one from the book of Revelation.
Paul - 1 Cor. 7:29 "the time is short", 1 Thess. 4:17 "we who are alive and remain shall be caught up", 2 Thess. 1:6-8 the Thessalonians' persecution will end by means of Jesus's coming in flaming fire, and Rom. 13:11 "our salvation is nearer than when we first believed"
Revelation - Rev. 22:7-10 which includes the frequent refrain "I am coming quickly" and the antithesis of Daniel 12:9, John is not to seal up the words like Daniel because the time is near.
My point in all of this is two fold. (1) I think your initial post about the necessity of righteous indignation concerning the Camping situation is justified so long as our zeal to correct others (and Camping should be corrected, and held responsible for his irresponsible teaching) does not blind us to the fact that eschatology has always been a difficult (even for the apostles?) and tricky subject to pin down. It should also not blind us from the fact that our own interpretations might have unperceived weaknesses. Many who have been quick to condemn Camping have quoted Mk. 13:32 and parallels. There is a very real chance that this passage is not even talking about the 2nd Coming. Do we have a response to Camping's eschatology (and the various forms of evangelical eschatology that are very similar to Camping's minus the date setting) if we cannot use that verse? (2) As stated in my initial comment I think the Camping situation is a great opportunity for Christians to teach Biblical eschatology. I fear that the use of Mk. 13:32 by some equates to "don't worry about eschatology at all" which is surely not what Jesus intended considering that the passage ends with an exhortation to "watch" (assuming for argument's sake that this passage is about the 2nd Coming). To this end I appreciate your efforts, Dr. Blomberg, in your teaching and the books you have written to try and teach Biblical eschatology. I therefore don't agree with your final paragraph in your initial post that sets focusing on eschatology against responsible engagement with the world right now. I think a better route would be to encourage believers to rediscover Biblical eschatology and see how much it empowers Christian mission in the present. Again the work of Tom Wright comes to mind as a wonderful example. Thanks for taking the time to respond.
Kirsten Usman Nov 16, 2011 1:52pm
I completely agree with this. I think that Camping is forcing unwanted and negative media onto Christianity. We should be focusing on what it means to live our lives as good Christians and bettering ourselves and our world.