header-craig blomberg blog

Why Go to Church?

← back to blog home

Jun 21, 2010 by Craig Blomberg | 12 Comments

“And let us consider how we may spur one another on toward love and good deeds, not giving up meeting together, as some are in the habit of doing, but encouraging one another—and all the more as you see the Day approaching” (Heb. 10:24-25; TNIV)

In our consumer culture, I shouldn’t be surprised that people treat church like a product. But I confess I continue to be surprised how long time, faithful churchgoers can suddenly “kick the habit” with seemingly little regret! Whether it’s a recent, young Denver Seminary graduate who was training to be a church leader or a middle-aged individual who just got tired of putting up with someone or something undesirable in their local congregation, people are abandoning regular church attendance in record numbers.

Hebrews 10, however, takes such a departure very seriously indeed. In the context of growing persecution of Christians in Rome in the early-to-mid-60s, one could almost understand why Jewish believers might want to play down their distinctives as followers of Yeshua and retreat to a form of worship indistinguishable from orthodox Judaism. They would thus retain their unique privilege as a religio licita, and not be forced to offer a pinch of incense in honor of Caesar as “Lord and God” as everyone else had to do. Once Nero unleashed his official, state-sponsored persecution against Christians in 64, they would be immune from imprisonment and martyrdom. Today, one can empathize with believers from North Korea and China to Iran and Afghanistan to Morocco and the Maldives, who might similarly hide their Christian identities and not gather regularly for worship and instruction with other believers, lest they be arrested and/or killed.

Ironically, it is precisely in such contexts where we also hear stories of great faith, great perseverance and great sacrifice for the sake of Christ and fellow Christians, including for gathering together with them. It’s here in the U.S., in the Western world more generally, where so much less is at stake that we offer up such pathetic reasons (at least I suspect God considers them pathetic) for not joining together with fellow believers on a regular, weekly basis. And almost all of the excuses are anthropocentric rather than Christocentric. That’s a fancy way of saying we’ve in essence reworded the well-known praise song to make it say, “It’s all about me, Lord,” rather than “It’s all about you, Jesus!”

We all know the excuses. We don’t like the style of worship or music. We don’t like the preaching. We don’t like the new time for Sunday School. We don’t like the way the church spends our money. More seriously, we don’t like certain people we have to see when we go. The list seems almost endless. Yet the other irony is that we in the West, especially in the United States, have far more choices of churches than anybody has ever had anywhere else in the history of the world! Before the advent of modern transportation, the two major criteria for why a given person belonged to church x (rather than church y) was because it was (a) the closest church to where they lived (b) in their denomination. Before the Protestant Reformation, only (a) applied, except in those comparatively few places where both Roman Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy existed side-by-side. One generally learned to work things out with the same group of people over a long period of time.

Today we are victims of our plethora of choices. Now hear me well. I’m grateful for those choices. There do come times when churches have substantially changed their beliefs or practices that for a person to be faithful to their own basic convictions they must move to a different congregation. If that happens, then move! But don’t just stop going anywhere.

Hear me, too, please, when I say that “church” as the New Testament defines it can be a house-church, it can be independent of all denominational affiliation, and it can take many creative forms and gather at many different times. I’m not saying all believers have to gather on Sunday morning, in a distinctive church building, with one prescribed liturgy or order of service. Not by a long shot. But consider the implied hubris (a fancy Greek word for “arrogance”) implied by the person who claims to be a Christian, claims to be in submission in Scripture, and yet also claims that no existing expressions of Christianity anywhere close to them are sufficiently God-pleasing for them to favor those gatherings with their presence!

Hebrews supplies the key to how to change one’s attitude in such situations. One goes to church not for what one can get but what one can give. Spur one another on toward love and good works and encourage one another. One of the occupational hazards of having studied the Scriptures to the extent that I have, and having visited as many diverse expressions of God’s family of faith worldwide as I have, is that it’s hard for any given worship service to affect me emotionally at the very core of my being with something that fairly jumps out at me and says, “yes, that’s exactly how we should be doing things.” I occasionally experience a little something along those lines, but I stress the words “a little.”

But it doesn’t take much at all to get me pumped with the idea of going to see friends and acquaintances, and to meet new people, whom I can encourage and love and teach. If I keep track of how much attention, gratitude and concern I am showed in return, I usually go away depressed (except when I’m a guest speaker somewhere, because at least some people have been trained to do such things). But if I remind myself that I shouldn’t be trying to keep track of such things, then I usually feel fulfilled. But even that is an anthropocentric criterion. I need to keep reminding myself that I go and do what I do simply because that’s what God wants and it’s what he has made me for.

Comments

12 Comments | Login to Post Comments

Rick Jory Jun 21, 2010 2:39pm

An interesting read that touches upon Dr. Blomberg's thoughts is the book "A Life With Purpose" by George Mair. This is a fairly brief bio on Rick Warren. It focuses on the mega-church builders, such as having a section on Robert Schuller's success (who "finally came to understand that sermons were meant not to convert, but rather to encourage and uplift people" - p. 105) and some of the tension between sharing God's Truth when many church goers "can't handle the Truth" (my plagiarism from whatever the movie was with Jack Nicholson and Tom Cruise). This whole mega-church trend is interesting. Is it good or bad? Yes.

Craig Blomberg Jun 21, 2010 2:54pm

Thanks, Rick. So much comes down to knowing your audience and what they need (not just what they want). My grandfather who suffered with horrible arthritis in the years before they invented hip-replacement surgery watched Schuller faithfully on television and couldn't speak highly enough of him. As a lifelong Lutheran, Grandpa knew the message of the law, sin and death very well but needed hope in the midst of suffering. For such people Schuller has been a lifeline. But for those who have yet to be convicted of their own sin, they may have to watch quite a lot of "Hours of Power" before they catch on.

Todd Marcy Jun 21, 2010 3:53pm

The beauty of the Church is resplendent! As Elizabeth Barrett Browning says, "How do I love thee? Let me count the ways! I love thee to the depth and breadth and height My soul can reach,..." I enjoy companionship with God at Church. I listen for the movement of Christ as He walks among his precious Church. I watch with anticipation for the fire and wind of the Holy Spirit in Church. I read with great expectation from the Word of God at Church. I love to hear the Gospel proclaimed by the blood-bought saints in the Church. I can't wait to see one who is distant from God to return to Him at His Church. I longingly use my gifts to build up others within His precious Church. One has but to wonder, dare I say it, guarding, strengthening, and defending His Church are the angels themselves. How do I love thee? My heart beats fast for Christ and His Church. The greatest hope for the world is Christ and His Church. "How do I love thee? Let me count the ways."

James Mason Jun 22, 2010 2:59pm

Thank you Dr. Blomberg, excellent blog. I suspect that many people are not rebelling against church per se but against the forms of church prevalent in our culture. I'm encouraged to observe that among some younger adults, the forms most eschewed are those which they believe promote an "It's all about me" Christianity. One example is the over-laden programmatic structures in churches which often only exist to appeal to our consumptive tendencies. My hope and belief is that some of this dissatisfaction with forms will morph into healthier expressions of church. Still, I agree with you that most (if not all) excuses to avoid church altogether are a sad violation of Scripture.
By the way, I'd love to hear or read your thoughts on whether or not you can embrace the "sodality" as an equally valid expression of the Church (to "modalities"). I'm thinking of those Christians who are living in missional communities or apostolic bands (I'm avoiding the term "para-church" as it may be too broad nowdays). Perhaps you could offer a critique of Ralph Winter's article "The Two Structures of God's Redemptive Mission" (Perspectives on the World Christian Movement, 4th ed., p244-253). Perhaps you've already critiqued these matters. If so, I'd love to see it! Thanks again.

Nathaniel Brown Jun 22, 2010 11:53pm

Dr. Blomberg, I myself have struggled greatly with the question of why go to church, and I appreciate your thoughts on the subject (which were well written) but it's the same answer I have received from so many when I have asked why we go to church. Many cite the verse you quoted "Let us not give up meeting together" but why does that mean I should go to church? If my community is say my classmates, and I meet with them to discuss the things of God, why should I attend church on Sunday? And then there's the frequently commented on issue of consumerism and how that overflows into "church shopping" as if looking for a church you enjoy is a sin (I'm not suggesting you said that but I have a concern that people leverage anti-consumerism to excuse poor church services and poor preaching). In reality, we should have church services that have a standard of excellence not a "well, you should just come because you should come, and it's not about you enjoying service" mantra, because then attending church services becomes a way to carry our cross: "Jesus, do you see how much I suffer for you? Aren't you proud that I made it through another of Pastor ******'s sermon?" All that to say that there needs to be reform on both sides of the issue.

Finally, I'd love to see your thoughts on other types of people. Your post targets a certain people type: Driven/devoted Christians. Could you write a post "selling" (if I may use that term) church to nonbelievers? Why should they darken the doors of our churches (whether house or mega church)? And what about those of us who love Jesus but aren't spiritual enough to force ourselves through another painful church experience?

I'm concerned about the number of people I have heard play guilt trips on attendees for their "consumerist" attitudes toward church (a valid concern, granted) but these critics usually don't come around and also challenge churches to meet a higher standard of excellence. To those outside the church this must sound like madness, "Yeah, I understand you don't enjoy coming here, but you're just being a consumer if you start looking for a church you enjoy going to." Well, shoot, if I'm a nonbeliever I think I'd just give up with the whole church thing. I guess that was a long winded way to say, I appreciate critique, but critique is easy, what our generation needs right now are suggestions of what to do. We can critique attitudes forever, but I want to hear some good suggestions of what to do. Could we leverage consumerism to bring people to Christ? Where's the middle ground here? And why are there not an equal number of critiques leveled at churches for their poor quality as there are critiques against consumerism in this country? Is the problem really only with our culture?

I hope that didn’t come across as attacking, I just want to see some of these issues explored in more detail, and I realize it’s a blog and not a thesis, but hopefully a blog would be the best places to address these issues anyway. Thanks for all you do here.

Finally, I'd love to see your thoughts on other types of people. Your post targets a certain people type: Driven/devoted Christians. Could you write a post "selling" (if I may use that term) church to nonbelievers? Why should they darken the doors of our churches (whether house or mega church)? And what about those of us who love Jesus but aren't spiritual enough to force ourselves through another painful church experience?

I'm concerned about the number of people I have heard play guilt trips on attendees for their "consumerist" attitudes toward church (a valid concern, granted) but these critics usually don't come around and also challenge that churches need to meet a higher standard of excellence. To those outside the church this must sound like madness, "Yeah, I understand you don't enjoy coming here, but you're just being a consumer if you start looking for a church you enjoy going to." Well, shoot, if I'm a nonbeliever I think I'd just give up with the whole church thing. I guess that was a long winded way to say, I appreciate critique, but critique is easy, what our generation needs right now are suggestions of what to do. We can critique attitudes forever, but I want to hear some good suggestions of what to do. Could we leverage consumerism to bring people to Christ? Where's the middle ground here? And why are there not an equal number of critiques leveled at churches for their poor quality as there are critiques against consumerism in this country? Is the problem really only with our culture?

I hope that didn’t come across as attacking, I just want to see some of these issues explored in more detail, and I realize it’s a blog and not a thesis, but hopefully a blog would be the best places to address these issues anyway. Thanks for all you do here.

Craig Blomberg Jun 23, 2010 9:05am

Great questions! No, I didn't in any way want to suggest that churches shouldn't do the very best job possible. It's just that I have the luxury in my position of visiting an awful lot of churches and am just aware of how many good ones there are, as well as others that are less so. Are there perfect churches? Of course not. But then the person who rejects all existing churches in favor of starting their own won't create the perfect one either and, quite frankly, in most cases won't create one nearly as good as several that already exist, or, if they do, it will take a significant period of time. Ny comments about house churches were designed to suggest that there ARE other ways to fulfill Hebrews 10:24-25 apart from more formal, established congregations. But when we put the whole range of things Scripture says believers should do when they congregate, a discussion group with fellow students about theology doesn't qualify. From Acts 2:42 we learn that there needs to be prayer, instruction, fellowship (which is subsequently defined as including the sharing of material possessions with the needy, and the Lord's Supper. From Eph. 5:18-20 we add in worship, including through singing. From Matt. 18:15-18 we know there need to be mechanisms for accountability and discipline, when needed. From 28:18-20 and numerous other texts we learn of our need for mission and for baptism. From 1 Timothy 3:1-13 come the need for elders and deacons in a leadership structure (or their functional equivalent). Get a group of your friends together and implement all of that and you have a church, whether you call it that or not. Do anything short of that and you're not fulfilling all of the God-designed desires for this people as a gathered community.

Paul Adams Jun 25, 2010 4:54pm

Craig:
Thanks for this. Of course, Heb 10 applies equally to those IN the church and have no inkling of leaving as well as to those believers who are/have left the church. Put differently, one can be steadily attending but not fulfilling Heb 10:24-25. In fact, I suspect that if all were committed to this passage that fewer would be leaving.

Paul Adams Jun 26, 2010 8:14pm

Hi Craig:
Appreciate your thoughts here, but I wonder...Why is it that Heb. 10:24-25 is so readily applied to those who have departed but not to those who remain in the church? Could it be that "long time, faithful churchgoers" would not be so quick to "kick the habit” if those in the church were faithful to spur everyone on to love and good deeds? This is not to say that many do depart for trivial or even unbiblical reasons, but I suspect that many "de-churched" have been sorely hurt by because the "faithful" have failed to take seriously Heb 10:24-25.

In other words, Heb 10:24-25 cuts both ways.

Paul Adams Jun 26, 2010 8:21pm

Understand the weight of this passage is on those who "give up meeting together," but this passage cuts both ways. It equally applies to the everyone in the church to encourage love and good deeds to one another. Sadly, this passage is seen as only targeting those who are either disheartened or de-churched but I suggest many are because the "faithful" who remain in the church have failed to take this passage seriously.

Craig Blomberg Jun 28, 2010 12:08pm

I agree Paul. But just as we are not allowed to stop loving our wives (or our neighbors, or our enemies) when they fail to love us, neither may we forsake our corporate responsibilities as Christians when others fail in theirs.

Craig Bennett Jul 26, 2010 11:25pm

An interesting article Craig.

There can be other issues at play about why people don't go to church. Research is showing that there is a high percentage of people who burn out within 4 - 7 years of joining a church. They either slow down or stop their contribution towards the church fellowship....

Others are deep hurts. I ministered to a lady at a memorial remembrance service for those who had suicided. I asked this lady if she was helped, she gripped my hands / forarms tightly telling me the story how her son had suicided. That Sunday at church the pastor stood in the pulpit declaring how those who suicide will go to hell... her husband stood up... took her and their daughters hand and walked out of the church... they had been involved with that church for a while... The lady told me through many tears... I have never lost my faith in Christ... only in the churches ability to truly minister into my pain..I now believe that I can go and find a church...

I faced the same pain and abandonment myself from my church when they blackbanned me. I was recovering from a serious illness, had to leave my wife because of her ongoing abusive nature. I had experienced the elders dragging me around the car park for over an hour one night.. because my right leg used to go dead / limp at times... (was dragged / prayed for against my will) Was then asked by a elder why I had left my wife... told him the bite to my wrist and blows to my head were the last straw and his comment was...what had I done to deserve it... I walked out of that church... and didn'y get involved again with another church for 3 months... I just did not trust Christians or the church with my illness and seperation issues.

I think its worthwhile asking people who claim not to need a church... why that is and see if there may be a deeper need to minister into...

Craig Blomberg Jul 27, 2010 8:57am

Absolutely, Craig. I've known such people, too, and ministered to them, too. My concerns in the original blog were primarily with (a) those who, even years later, use such experiences as an "excuse" for no organized Christian fellowship of any kind anywhere, and (b) the (in my experience) majority who have far less serious reasons for not attending anywhere.