
Three Books That Influenced Me Most
Dec 17, 2008 by Doug Groothuis | 3 Comments
Every thinker is shaped by the books he or she reads, but some books leave a deep and lasting impression in the mind and heart. These three books have contributed crucially to my calling as a Christian philosopher. I commend all of them to those endeavoring to think and live well for the matchless cause of Christ.
1. Francis A. Schaeffer, The God Who Is There (InterVarsity Press). Originally published in 1968. 30th anniversary edition published in 1998.
I first read The God Who Is There by Francis Schaeffer in the fall of 1976, my sophomore year in college-just a few months after my conversion to Christ. It is not an overstatement to say that it revolutionized my view of Christian faith and endeavor. I had spent the first few troubled months of the Christian life not knowing how to think about the great intellectual issues that I had been introduced to in my first year of college. This caused considerable distress of soul. But Schaeffer, the savvy evangelist and apologist, wasn't afraid of the great ideas. In fact, he argued that the Christian world view is objectively true, rational, and that it offers unique hope and meaning to a post-Christian culture awash in despair and confusion. Schaeffer did not answer all my questions, and I have come to question a few of his judgments (particularly his reading of a few philosophers), but The God Who is There helped spark a grand view of ministry that has never dimmed. We must love the lost, take culture seriously, and outthink the world for Christ.
2. Blaise Pascal, Pensées (various editions). I particularly appreciate the Penguin edition, edited by Alban Krailsheimer, originally published in 1966. The introduction is superb.
I have been reading Pascal's profound reflections for thirty years, and I don't plan on stopping. I find myself quoting him in my writing and speaking frequently. I first picked this volume out of my mother's collection of The Great Books in the summer of 1977. The volume consists of over 900 fragments of a book Pascal never completed, which would have been an apologetic for the Christian faith. Nevertheless, many of the fragments--some more developed and refined than others-were so brilliant that Pascal's family published them after his death in 1662. He was only 39. Pascal, a celebrated scientist and mathematician, understood that the gospel was the only key that could unlock the meaning of the human condition. His reflections on the greatness and misery of humanity are unparalleled in their wisdom and apologetic power. We are great because made in God's image and likeness; but we are miserable because we are fallen. We are deposed royalty in need of the Mediator, Jesus Christ.
3. Søren Kierkegaard, Purity of Heart is to Will One Thing (various editions).
Although I cannot agree with much of Kierkegaard's religious philosophy (particularly his fideism), this devotional book was pivotal in my sense of divine calling. Kierkegaard aimed to reform the dry and dead Lutheran orthodoxy of his day by stimulating his readers to rediscover the Christianity of the New Testament and to stand naked as individuals before God himself. This book summons the reader to consider their lives before the "audit of eternity" and to order all their affairs so as to "will the good in the truth," without excuse and without wavering and against the crowd, if need be. Through reading it, I discovered that God was calling me to engage the life of the mind as a lifelong pursuit. At the time (1977 or 1978), I did not know what shape this commitment would take, but the Lord's will was made known to me through this remarkable and penetrating book.


Comments
3 Comments | Login to Post Comments
William Farris Dec 18, 2008 12:44pm
I, too, was introduced to Schaeffer back in the early seventies by a "hippy" Sunday School teacher who had spent a lot of time at L'Abri during its heyday, and also by A. E. Wilder-Smith when he visited my church. Josh McDowell in those days was very keen to quote from Pascal's Pensees as well as Simon Greenleaf in his apologetics conferences. My understanding of apologetics in those days consisted primarily of refutations of evolutionary thinking such as that offered by Henry Morris. These other guys greatly broadened my awareness that there are far more significant issues at stake. I suppose that the final thrust that spurred me on to consider PR as the foundation for all apologetics activity was listening to a series of talks by Norman Geisler around 1980.
My internal debate then was sorting out the differences between the presuppositional approach of Schaeffer and, more so by Van Til (I was a member of a Westminster-styled church), and the evidentialist approach of the scientists and R. C. Sproul. In the end I was more attracted to classical apologetics thanks to the writings of John Warwick Montgomery and Gordon Clark. I also recall that Gordon Lewis has some very influential things to say in his "Testing Christianity's Truth Claims."
Since those days that internecine debate has abated, save for the Trinity Foundation, perhaps. The battle lines are far clearer than ever with the emergence of the new atheism, and it would appear that the abductive approach of today's apologetics is most applicable. But those classic works are still very much at the core. Autonomous humanity still can reason the way to God.
Daniel Seatvet Dec 18, 2008 1:55pm
Great list of books. I was curious: There has been so much written in the last 25 years on the subject of apologetics. What would you say are your favorite books from philosophers/apologists who are actively "in the field"?
Sarah Schoonmaker Dec 18, 2008 11:59pm
Great list of influential books. Pascal's Pensees are one of my top three as well. Out of the collection of books I read for philosophy courses at Denver Seminary, I would point to the following other than Pascal as most influential: Neil Postman's Amusing Ourselves Death, Pojman's Classics of Philosophy (good overview of philosophers), J.P. Moreland's Scaling The Secular City and Love Your God With All Your Mind.
Pascal most accurately explains the human condition and the need for God to equivocate despair. Postman best describes America’s tragic obsession with entertainment. This explains why Americans base most decisions on images and personal preferences rather than thoughtful consideration. Postman also accurately asserts that news anchors and Hollywood stars base everything on the entertainment factor, reducing critical thinking to mere subjective inklings. May Americans flee from worshipping the kingdom of comfort and align with God’s redemptive mission.
One way this may be accomplished is ministering to the lost by not merely providing handouts whether its tracks or food. Investing in the lives of others facilitates the most transformation. This may be done through mentoring or building friendships. It is interesting, the more people engage in thoughtful community, the less time they spend watching TV or pursuing other distractions. On the other hand, while I do watch TV occasionally and even find various distractions helpful at times, I typically devote most of my time to reading various authors and developing relationships. For life stories bear witness to God’s handiwork.
As for J.P. Moreland, his writings challenge me about morality and meaning as he argues that it emanates from God. I have not found an adequate answer to the issue of objective morality and meaning apart from God yet, but I am still searching.
The top three books that have influenced me to even consider Christianity a delusion are the following: John Loftus's Why I Became an Atheist, Kai Nelson's Philosophy & Atheism, & Edwin Curley's Spinoza Reader on Ethics & Other Works. I would say Loftus presents the strongest case against the credibility of the Bible and philosophical arguments for God's existence. If you would like to know more about why I chose Kai Nelson and Edwin Curley’s books, just let me know.
A Christian theology book I am currently reading is N.T. Wright’s Surprised By Hope. This offers a refreshing view on heaven, the resurrection, and the mission of the church. I am not finished reading this yet, but plan to write comments on it soon.
I have also recently read an article by Paul Copan “Is Yahweh a Moral Monster?†There are some solid points about interpreting the challenging passages on God and war in the OT, but I find several of his points inadequate, which will be outlined in some notes over the next couple of weeks.